Crane rental with operator · Wisconsin

Ideal Crane Rental, Inc.

Madison, WI · ~55 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ideal Crane Rental, Inc. runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Crane rental with operator workplace, earning a grade C.

Ideal Crane Rental, Inc.: 2.6 TCR = 94% of Crane rental with operator BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ideal Crane Rental, Inc. safety composite

Ideal Crane Rental, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2016→2024

Ideal Crane Rental, Inc. injury rate improved

Ideal Crane Rental, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.5 from 6.6 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.6 · 2017=5.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Madison, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 94% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #10/35
  • PHOTO Guidemark Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Guidemark Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Ideal Crane Rental, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ideal Crane Rental, Inc. averages 2.6 TCR (94% of the Crane rental with operator BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ideal Crane Rental, Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.6 · 2017=5.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Ideal Crane Rental, Inc. falls in its industry

1,634 Crane rental with operator establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 35 Crane rental with operator employers in Wisconsin.

Ideal Crane Rental, Inc. (55 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Ideal Crane Rental, Inc.
Ideal Crane Rental, Inc. (55 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Ideal Crane Rental, Inc. has more employees than the Crane rental with operator median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2019 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.9 2.9 6 0 0
2016 6.6 4.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · WI · Madison

1,634 Crane rental with operator employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 577 employers in Madison, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Guidemark Inc 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Net Connection LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR America's Fence Store Inc 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holiday Pools of West Florida, Inc. 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Siemers Holstein Farm, Inc. - Main Farm 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Substation 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Luamben Green Service Corp 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE KOHLER SERVICE ORGANIZATION 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital - Madison 2,401 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meriter Hospital 2,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR EatStreet 1,659 FTE
CITY-NEAR TDS - Junction Road (All Employees) 1,302 FTE
NAT-TCR RLS Cold Storage - Pittston 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Glass, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR DelVa Construction Corp 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Dart Logistics Services - Dallas 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midland Steel Company 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hustler Conveyor Company 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Foods_Chicago 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE MK Enterprises, Inc. 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.