Earth station communications equipment manufacturing · Massachusetts

I.F. Engineering Corp

Dudley, MA · ~23 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

I.F. Engineering Corp runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Earth station communications equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

I.F. Engineering Corp: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Earth station communications equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

I.F. Engineering Corp safety composite

I.F. Engineering Corp scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

I.F. Engineering Corp held a steady TCR band

I.F. Engineering Corp's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334220 · Dudley, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/12
  • PHOTO Lenovo - Moto (Motor…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lenovo - Moto (Motorola) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

I.F. Engineering Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows I.F. Engineering Corp averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Earth station communications equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

I.F. Engineering Corp TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where I.F. Engineering Corp falls in its industry

247 Earth station communications e establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 12 Earth station communications e employers in Massachusetts.

I.F. Engineering Corp (23 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate I.F. Engineering Corp
I.F. Engineering Corp (23 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1

I.F. Engineering Corp has fewer employees than the Earth station communications equipment m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334220 · MA · Dudley

247 Earth station communications equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 9 employers in Dudley, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lenovo - Moto (Motorola) 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viasat - Denver 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TX140 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Massari 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE SANDY POND-MA44 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE NORTH ANDOVER-HAVERHILL-MA29 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE 956-NiSource-Wrentham MA 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Integrated Builders, Inc. 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gentex Optics, Inc. 423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nichols College 423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henke Sass Wolf of America, Inc 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shield Packaging Co Inc 85 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Envision Printing, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Magic Transportation 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE U.S.A. Drives, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anderson Bus Company of Frazee 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Finishing, Inc. 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.