Flavor extracts (except coffee) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc.

Philadelphia, PA · ~166 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc. runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Flavor extracts (except coffee) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 46% of Flavor extracts (except coffee) manufacturing BLS 4.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc. safety composite

IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc.: 1.1 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2018

IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc.'s TCR rose 1.5 from 1.1 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311942 · Philadelphia, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 46% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Elite Spice: Magellan
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~166 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elite Spice: Magellan (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (46% of the Flavor extracts (except coffee) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2018=2.7 · BLS 4.1

Where IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc. falls in its industry

200 Flavor extracts (except coffee establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Flavor extracts (except coffee employers in Pennsylvania.

IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc. (166 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc.
IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc. (166 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.5

IFF Formerly David Michael & Co., Inc. has more employees than the Flavor extracts (except coffee) manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.7 1.3 4 0 0
2016 1.1 0.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311942 · PA · Philadelphia

200 Flavor extracts (except coffee) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elite Spice: Magellan 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salt-Watkins Glen 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kerry Ingredients 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rich Products Moonachie 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Premier Select Sires, Inc. 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boro Developers, Inc. d/b/a Boro Construction 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Appellation Construction Services, LLC 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haverfield Aviation 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Murfreesboro 2 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-PD-FLO-FLORENCE-PD 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dunham Avenue 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CN Irvine 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE SCC of Alpine Rehabilitation Center 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silgan Plastics Ottawa 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canton Headquarters 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Texas Medical Center Emergency Medical Sercvices (Henderson County) 166 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.