Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) · Texas

iFLY Corporate Support Center

Austin, TX · ~104 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

iFLY Corporate Support Center runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) workplace, earning a grade A.

iFLY Corporate Support Center: 1.0 TCR = 32% of Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) BLS 3.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

iFLY Corporate Support Center safety composite

iFLY Corporate Support Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

iFLY Corporate Support Center: 0.0 → 0.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2019

iFLY Corporate Support Center's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713990 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/28
  • PHOTO Niles Park District
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Niles Park District (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

iFLY Corporate Support Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows iFLY Corporate Support Center averages 1.0 TCR (32% of the Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

iFLY Corporate Support Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=0.8 · BLS 3.1

Where iFLY Corporate Support Center falls in its industry

289 Amusement device (except gambl establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 28 Amusement device (except gambl employers in Texas.

iFLY Corporate Support Center (104 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate iFLY Corporate Support Center
iFLY Corporate Support Center (104 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 5.0

iFLY Corporate Support Center has more employees than the Amusement device (except gambling) conce median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.2 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713990 · TX · Austin

289 Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Niles Park District 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Topgolf Brooklyn Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Topgolf El Paso 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Disney Global Product Development and Creative, Inc. 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oncor SOSF 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE JASPER NEWTON ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Carlos Location 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE SLSCO 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Palatec Mfg Inc 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stryver Manufacturing, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GA- Siskorsky 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Champaign, IL 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Panel Built, Inc 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Aa Admiral Club Ord Cc H/K 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carpet Cleaning & Water Restoration 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Covanta Niagara I, LLC 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.