Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) · Texas

iFLY Houston

Houston, TX · ~36 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.1
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

iFLY Houston runs at 423% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) workplace, earning a grade F.

iFLY Houston: 13.1 TCR = 423% of Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) BLS 3.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

iFLY Houston safety composite

iFLY Houston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2016→2019

iFLY Houston injury rate improved

iFLY Houston's TCR fell 6.0 from 11.4 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 22.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.4 · 2018=22.5 · 2019=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713990 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.1 · 423% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #23/28
  • PHOTO Milpitas Golfland
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Milpitas Golfland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

iFLY Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows iFLY Houston averages 13.1 TCR (423% of the Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

iFLY Houston TCR series: 2016=11.4 · 2018=22.5 · 2019=5.4 · BLS 3.1

Where iFLY Houston falls in its industry

289 Amusement device (except gambl establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 28 Amusement device (except gambl employers in Texas.

iFLY Houston (36 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate iFLY Houston
iFLY Houston (36 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 5.0

iFLY Houston has fewer employees than the Amusement device (except gambling) conce median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.4 5.4 1 0 0
2018 22.5 13.5 5 0 0
2016 11.4 11.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713990 · TX · Houston

289 Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Milpitas Golfland 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FLL-SGI-IFLY FORT LAUDERDALE 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Brookfield - Parks & Recreation 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flagstaff Extreme 13.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE FRONTIER FEED YARD 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paco Feedyard 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coyote Lake Feedyard Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Waelder 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Sater Electric, Inc 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Reliable Bike 7790 S. Quincy 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Orchard View Manor 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR RRC - Birdfood 13.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Iberia Extended Care Hospital 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE JR Dairy 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn Winston Salem 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE DBA Ashley Furniture Homestores- Hawthorne 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.