Gun sighting and fire control equipment and instruments, optical, manufacturing · Florida

II-VI Optical Systems - Florida

Port Richey, FL · ~21 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

II-VI Optical Systems - Florida runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Gun sighting and fire control equipment and instruments, optical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

II-VI Optical Systems - Florida: 2.0 TCR = 60% of Gun sighting and fire control equipment and instruments, optical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

II-VI Optical Systems - Florida safety composite

II-VI Optical Systems - Florida scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

II-VI Optical Systems - Florida: 0.0 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2019

II-VI Optical Systems - Florida's TCR rose 3.9 from 0.0 in 2017 to 3.9 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333314 · Port Richey, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 60% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO 2967-CA141
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2967-CA141 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

II-VI Optical Systems - Florida in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows II-VI Optical Systems - Florida averages 2.0 TCR (60% of the Gun sighting and fire control equipment and instruments, optical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

II-VI Optical Systems - Florida TCR series: 2017=0 · 2019=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where II-VI Optical Systems - Florida falls in its industry

145 Gun sighting and fire control establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Gun sighting and fire control employers in Florida.

II-VI Optical Systems - Florida (21 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate II-VI Optical Systems - Florida
II-VI Optical Systems - Florida (21 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 1.8

II-VI Optical Systems - Florida has fewer employees than the Gun sighting and fire control equipment median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333314 · FL · Port Richey

145 Gun sighting and fire control equipment and instruments, optical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 42 employers in Port Richey, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2967-CA141 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holographix 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oregon 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tiffen 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE SMR Farms 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woerner Farms LLC - CLA 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parkesdale Farms Packing & Cooling Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELOGIA POWER LLC 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1085 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1085 354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seaway Plastics Engineering LLC 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 0767 143 FTE
NAT-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Northwest District : SVC-Seattle WA-USA 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 30850-Capstone Smithfield Greenfield 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 26 Ward JV 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Chicago Dept of Fleet and Facility Management - Fuel Sites 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Adult Day Services 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Macomb City Fire Dept. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Aviation - PNE 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kapolei Packaged Gas Plant 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.