Freight Transportation Arrangement · Illinois

Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville

Bensenville, IL · ~163 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Freight Transportation Arrangement workplace, earning a grade A.

Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville: 0.6 TCR = 14% of Freight Transportation Arrangement BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville safety composite

Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2019→2023

Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville injury rate improved

Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.1 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488510 · Bensenville, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/28
  • PHOTO TNMKT - Coyote Chatt…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~163 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TNMKT - Coyote Chattanooga (TNMKT) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville averages 0.6 TCR (14% of the Freight Transportation Arrangement BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville TCR series: 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville falls in its industry

358 Freight Transportation Arrange establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 28 Freight Transportation Arrange employers in Illinois.

Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville (163 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville
Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville (163 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Ilbes - Chicago/Bensenville has more employees than the Freight Transportation Arrangement median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2020 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2019 1.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488510 · IL · Bensenville

358 Freight Transportation Arrangement employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 82 employers in Bensenville, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TNMKT - Coyote Chattanooga (TNMKT) 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Panalpina Houston 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Two Pierce Place Office 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Expeditors International 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mid-American Growers 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peter Baker & Son Co. 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atomatic Mechanical Services, Inc. 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diebold Nixdorf Schaumburg IL 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3Y US Foods Bensenville 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Foods Chicago 387 FTE
CITY-NEAR ORD - Main facility 367 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Foods Bensenville 366 FTE
NAT-TCR Support Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Topocean Consolidation Service, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Milam Construction 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR DENSO Manufacturing Athens Tennessee, INC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Scott Street Senior Housing Complex dba Rhoda Goldman Plaza 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maddox Electric Office 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peterson Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Piqua Steel Company, Inc dba PSC Crane & Rigging 163 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.