Sweet corn farming, field and seed production · Idaho

Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa

Nampa, ID · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Sweet corn farming, field and seed production workplace, earning a grade C.

Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa: 4.0 TCR = 90% of Sweet corn farming, field and seed production BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa safety composite

Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa: 0.0 → 12.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.1 TCR · DART/TCR 3× in 2024

Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa's TCR rose 12.1 from 0.0 in 2022 to 12.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Nampa, ID AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 90% of ind

  • DART 12.1 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Firebaugh
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Firebaugh (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa averages 4.0 TCR (90% of the Sweet corn farming, field and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=12.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa falls in its industry

331 Sweet corn farming, field and establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Sweet corn farming, field and employers in Idaho.

Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa (20 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa
Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa (20 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa has fewer employees than the Sweet corn farming, field and seed produ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.1 12.1 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · ID · Nampa

331 Sweet corn farming, field and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 228 employers in Nampa, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Firebaugh 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robert C Hatton Inc 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunset Farms, Inc 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR George Chiala Farms - Morgan Hill 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms - Holbrook 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quality Forest, Inc 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hop Field 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 00211 RIGBY OFFICE 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BOI2 2,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center, Nampa (Garrity)-SAHS-ID/OR 1,047 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Nampa 922 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lactalis Nampa 863 FTE
NAT-TCR Gershwin Theatre 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Frankfort Plant 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Volvo Group Trucks Operations - Hagerstown, Maryland 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bandon Dunes LP 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 939-NiSource-Buena Vista VA-Opr Ctr 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paradise II LLC 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Station 2-1 Butte Fire 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palmer Pool 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.