Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing · California

Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd

Sacramento, CA · ~28 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd safety composite

Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd held a steady TCR band

Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #38/50
  • PHOTO TriLink Biotechnolog…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TriLink Biotechnologies LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd falls in its industry

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diag establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 50 Blood derivative in-vitro diag employers in California.

Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd (28 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd
Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd (28 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Immuno Concepts, N.A Ltd has fewer employees than the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic sub median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.7 5.7 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · CA · Sacramento

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TriLink Biotechnologies LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cell Marque Corporation 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Creek 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ortho Clinical Diagnostics Raritan 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Round Rock TX Millwork 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Aurora Cooperative - Grand Island Agronomy 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Neal Blaisdell Waikiki Shell 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR General Landscaping LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sunray Printing Solutions Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hartford South 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bus Garage 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE District Wide 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.