Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction · California

In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group

Baldwin Park, CA · ~138 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group runs at 229% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction workplace, earning a grade F.

In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group: 6.6 TCR = 229% of Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group safety composite

In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group: 7.2 → 7.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2021

In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group's TCR rose 0.4 from 7.2 in 2017 to 7.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Baldwin Park, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 229% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #417/486
  • PHOTO WFC Builders
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WFC Builders (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group averages 6.6 TCR (229% of the Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group TCR series: 2017=7.2 · 2018=10 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=2 · 2021=7.6 · BLS 2.9

Where In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group falls in its industry

4,692 Warehouse, commercial and inst establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #417 safest of 486 Warehouse, commercial and inst employers in California.

In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group (138 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group
In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group (138 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group has more employees than the Warehouse, commercial and institutional, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.6 5.7 8 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2019 6.2 4.2 6 0 0
2018 10.0 10.0 18 0 0
2017 7.2 7.2 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Baldwin Park

4,692 Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 68 employers in Baldwin Park, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WFC Builders 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Altercon Construction Company 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR G. & H. Contracting, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recreational Design & Construction, Inc. 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westerlay Orchids LP 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danell Custom Harvesting LLC - DCH629 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sustainable Labor Solutions, Inc 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE RLH Fire Protection 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baldwin Park Unified School District 2,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881501 BALDWIN PARK HOSPITAL 1,624 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-08181501 1,555 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAN GABRIEL HUB (CASGA) 1,345 FTE
NAT-TCR WLC 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tcw, Inc Dalton 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond West Babylon 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Richland Center 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sabin Metal Scottsville NY 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Access Demolition Contracting, Inc. 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oklahoma Tire Recyclers LLC 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross Casting & Innovation LLC 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.