Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Wisconsin

Inclusa - Rice Lake

Rice Lake, WI · ~33 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Inclusa - Rice Lake runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Inclusa - Rice Lake: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Inclusa - Rice Lake safety composite

Inclusa - Rice Lake scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Inclusa - Rice Lake held a steady TCR band

Inclusa - Rice Lake's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Rice Lake, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/26
  • PHOTO Community Interface …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Community Interface services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Inclusa - Rice Lake in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Inclusa - Rice Lake averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Inclusa - Rice Lake TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Inclusa - Rice Lake falls in its industry

1,320 Self-help organizations for di establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 26 Self-help organizations for di employers in Wisconsin.

Inclusa - Rice Lake (33 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Inclusa - Rice Lake
Inclusa - Rice Lake (33 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Inclusa - Rice Lake has fewer employees than the Self-help organizations for disabled per median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · WI · Rice Lake

1,320 Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 44 employers in Rice Lake, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Community Interface services 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chicago Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Changing Lives in The Central Valley, LLC 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Noffke Lumber Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4769-61-WILLIAMS SONOMA 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duo Safety Ladder Corporation 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kunes RV Super Center 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeview Medical Center 508 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMC- Rice Lake 435 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1446 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Repeating Arms - Rice Lake 394 FTE
NAT-TCR Binghamton 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Detroit 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Port Chester 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Richmond East 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Roswell Service Center 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carlsbad Service Center 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Table Mountain Service Center 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc - Canton Ronda 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.