Rubbish hauling without collection or disposal, truck, local · Indiana

Indianapolis

Indianapolis, IN · ~466 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Indianapolis runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Rubbish hauling without collection or disposal, truck, local workplace, earning a grade B.

Indianapolis: 2.8 TCR = 63% of Rubbish hauling without collection or disposal, truck, local BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Indianapolis safety composite

Indianapolis scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2024

Indianapolis injury rate improved

Indianapolis's TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/38
  • PHOTO Carolina Sunrock Int…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 81 inj
  • SIZE ~466 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carolina Sunrock Interhaul Transportation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Indianapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Indianapolis averages 2.8 TCR (63% of the Rubbish hauling without collection or disposal, truck, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Indianapolis TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=3 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=4 · 2023=2 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Indianapolis falls in its industry

1,130 Rubbish hauling without collec establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 38 Rubbish hauling without collec employers in Indiana.

Indianapolis (466 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Indianapolis
Indianapolis (466 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Indianapolis has more employees than the Rubbish hauling without collection or di median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 4 0 0
2023 2.0 0.4 5 0 0
2022 4.0 0.0 10 0 1
2021 1.8 0.0 4 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 4 0 0
2019 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2018 6.6 6.2 16 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 10 0 0
2016 4.7 1.4 26 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · IN · Indianapolis

1,130 Rubbish hauling without collection or disposal, truck, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carolina Sunrock Interhaul Transportation 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR James R. Poshard & Son, Inc 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR McPherson T & M 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bob's Moraine Trucking, Inc. 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sony DADC TH 466 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fort Wayne Facility 466 FTE
STATE-SIZE Champion Home Builders, Inc. 467 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vanguard National Trailer, Inc 467 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Landes Trucking 72001 Jacksonville 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ele Corporation 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Redner's Warehouse Market Shenandoah 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Marlboro Wire Ltd. 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Unity- St. Mary's 466 FTE
NAT-SIZE IFF South Brunswick 466 FTE
NAT-SIZE potter concrete ltd 466 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ridgeway Plumbing, Inc. 466 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.