Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking · Indiana

Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND

Indianapolis, IN · ~578 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking workplace, earning a grade D.

Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND: 5.4 TCR = 120% of Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND safety composite

Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND: 5.7 → 6.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.05× in 2024

Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND's TCR rose 0.8 from 5.7 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 120% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #56/95
  • PHOTO Pasco WA FXFE-PAS
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 215 inj
  • SIZE ~578 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pasco WA FXFE-PAS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND averages 5.4 TCR (120% of the Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND TCR series: 2016=5.7 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND falls in its industry

3,020 Less Than Truckload General Fr establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 95 Less Than Truckload General Fr employers in Indiana.

Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND (578 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND
Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND (578 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Indianapolis IN FXFE-IND has more employees than the Less Than Truckload General Freight Truc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 5.7 33 0 0
2023 5.2 3.9 27 0 0
2022 5.5 4.0 32 0 0
2021 4.4 2.9 23 0 0
2020 3.9 3.0 21 0 0
2019 6.8 4.3 43 0 0
2016 5.7 3.8 36 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · IN · Indianapolis

3,020 Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pasco WA FXFE-PAS 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilmington NC FXFE-WMN 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATW-ODFL 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6284-YR-178 YT 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amcor Flexibles 579 FTE
STATE-SIZE POLYWOOD Syracuse 579 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dorel Juvenile Group 579 FTE
STATE-SIZE IN002 - IN-Indianapolis-Operating CentER 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Pasco WA FXFE-PAS 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilmington NC FXFE-WMN 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bob Anderson Builders, Inc. 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Canyon Winds Retirement LLC 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arlans and field service 578 FTE
NAT-SIZE NORDAM Interiors and Structures 578 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Park Meadow (5501) 578 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waldo- 118 Northport Ave 578 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.