Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Indiana

Indianapolis Preprint

Indianapolis, IN · ~75 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Indianapolis Preprint runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Indianapolis Preprint: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Indianapolis Preprint safety composite

Indianapolis Preprint scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2024

Indianapolis Preprint injury rate improved

Indianapolis Preprint's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/67
  • PHOTO U.S. Display Group TN
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: U.S. Display Group TN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Indianapolis Preprint in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Indianapolis Preprint averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Indianapolis Preprint TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Indianapolis Preprint falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 67 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Indiana.

Indianapolis Preprint (75 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Indianapolis Preprint
Indianapolis Preprint (75 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Indianapolis Preprint has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.5 2.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · IN · Indianapolis

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR U.S. Display Group TN 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alpha RPC - D002 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MINNEAPOLIS, MN 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Packaging Corp - Germantown 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - FB Culley 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Graber Crews 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Precision Wall Systems, Inc. 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Natick #211 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Haskell Company 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Marine Services LLC (Houma Shipyard ) 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Myerstown Location 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE IHG Army Hotels - Fort Knox (Holiday Inn Express/Army Lodging) 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bristol Polymers 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE DMI Contractors 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gerald Jones Ford LLC 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.