Engraving metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade · Wisconsin

Industrial Engraving, LLC

Pulaski, WI · ~26 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Industrial Engraving, LLC runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Engraving metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

Industrial Engraving, LLC: 3.0 TCR = 90% of Engraving metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Industrial Engraving, LLC safety composite

Industrial Engraving, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Industrial Engraving, LLC: 5.0 → 7.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Industrial Engraving, LLC's TCR rose 2.0 from 5.0 in 2016 to 7.0 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Pulaski, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 90% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/56
  • PHOTO LB Foster Ball Winch
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LB Foster Ball Winch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Industrial Engraving, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Industrial Engraving, LLC averages 3.0 TCR (90% of the Engraving metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Industrial Engraving, LLC TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=7 · BLS 3.3

Where Industrial Engraving, LLC falls in its industry

646 Engraving metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 56 Engraving metals and metal pro employers in Wisconsin.

Industrial Engraving, LLC (26 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Industrial Engraving, LLC
Industrial Engraving, LLC (26 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Industrial Engraving, LLC has fewer employees than the Engraving metals and metal products (exc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.0 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.7 5.7 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.0 5.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · WI · Pulaski

646 Engraving metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 16 employers in Pulaski, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LB Foster Ball Winch 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR V&S Lebanon Galvanizing LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bham 1 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AZZ Galvanizing - Louisiana, LLC 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE WORZELLA & SONS, INC. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spring Grove Dairy 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ross Soil Service LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABS 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCL Industries, inc. 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cruiserys Yachts Pulaski 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Tek Entertainment 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chase 75 FTE
NAT-TCR Park Region Mutual Telephone Coop 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Pacific Medical Center (274-CC-CND) 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutter East Bay Medical Foundation (227-975) 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR H&S Distribution Annapolis Junction 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Americold Piedmont, SC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Carterville - FD 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Larsen Baker LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Njr Group, LLC 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.