Filters, industrial and general purpose-type (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing · Indiana

Industrial Filter Manufacturers

Evansville, IN · ~59 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Industrial Filter Manufacturers runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Filters, industrial and general purpose-type (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Industrial Filter Manufacturers: 6.2 TCR = 187% of Filters, industrial and general purpose-type (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Industrial Filter Manufacturers safety composite

Industrial Filter Manufacturers scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Industrial Filter Manufacturers: 3.4 → 9.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2024

Industrial Filter Manufacturers's TCR rose 5.6 from 3.4 in 2023 to 9.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333998 · Evansville, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 187% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK P18
  • PHOTO KMC - KUKA Systems N…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KMC - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Industrial Filter Manufacturers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Industrial Filter Manufacturers averages 6.2 TCR (187% of the Filters, industrial and general purpose-type (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Industrial Filter Manufacturers TCR series: 2023=3.4 · 2024=9 · BLS 3.3

Where Industrial Filter Manufacturers falls in its industry

34 Filters, industrial and genera establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Industrial Filter Manufacturers (59 employees, TCR 6.2) among 17 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 18 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Industrial Filter Manufacturers
Industrial Filter Manufacturers (59 employees, TCR 6.2) among 17 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Industrial Filter Manufacturers has fewer employees than the Filters, industrial and general purpose- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.0 5.4 5 0 0
2023 3.4 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333998 · IN · Evansville

34 Filters, industrial and general purpose-type (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 489 employers in Evansville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KMC - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORGO-THERMIT, INC. 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FANUC - Centerpoint 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TJ Merroe DBA Rother Machine 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bio Town Ag, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spy Run Building 3 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Annex Group 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE JGBowers, Inc. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deaconess Midtown 3,068 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global - Evansville, IN (Oakley Str.) 2,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global 2,017 FTE
CITY-NEAR NBC Merchants, LLC 1,859 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant Food Stores 6329 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Petersburg 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Woody Springs 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant 315 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Columbia Cottage Linglestown 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Orange County Wastewater Authority 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flower City Tissue Mills Company Inc. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE RRSC Boston North 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.