Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers · Missouri

Industrial Process Equipment Group

St Louis, MO · ~39 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Industrial Process Equipment Group runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Industrial Process Equipment Group: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Industrial Process Equipment Group safety composite

Industrial Process Equipment Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Industrial Process Equipment Group held a steady TCR band

Industrial Process Equipment Group's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423830 · St Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/25
  • PHOTO Corporate
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corporate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Industrial Process Equipment Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Industrial Process Equipment Group averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Industrial Process Equipment Group TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Industrial Process Equipment Group falls in its industry

911 Industrial machinery and equip establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 25 Industrial machinery and equip employers in Missouri.

Industrial Process Equipment Group (39 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Industrial Process Equipment Group
Industrial Process Equipment Group (39 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Industrial Process Equipment Group has fewer employees than the Industrial machinery and equipment (exce median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423830 · MO · St Louis

911 Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 349 employers in St Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cameron 4646 W Sam Houston Parkway N 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR US TX Houston 7402 N Eldridge Pkwy/Firebrick 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOUTHERN OPERATIONS 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MO White Oak 006-0138-WG, WH, WT 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Radiation Protection 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL ST LOUIS 5,790 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital South 3,776 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4M Building Solutions 2,111 FTE
CITY-NEAR HES Facilities Services Higher Education 1,607 FTE
NAT-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TX-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Linde - Arroyo 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linde - Cartersville 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Krosaki Magnesita Refractories 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sioux Falls - 110 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.