Gas analyzers, industrial process-type, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Industrial Scientific Corporation

Pittsburgh, PA · ~443 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Industrial Scientific Corporation runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gas analyzers, industrial process-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Industrial Scientific Corporation: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Gas analyzers, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Industrial Scientific Corporation safety composite

Industrial Scientific Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2019→2024

Industrial Scientific Corporation injury rate improved

Industrial Scientific Corporation's TCR fell 0.6 from 0.8 in 2019 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.8 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #6/32
  • PHOTO S20 SEN - ANDOVER
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~443 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S20 SEN - ANDOVER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Industrial Scientific Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Industrial Scientific Corporation averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Gas analyzers, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Industrial Scientific Corporation TCR series: 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Industrial Scientific Corporation falls in its industry

322 Gas analyzers, industrial proc establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 32 Gas analyzers, industrial proc employers in Pennsylvania.

Industrial Scientific Corporation (443 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Industrial Scientific Corporation
Industrial Scientific Corporation (443 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Industrial Scientific Corporation has more employees than the Gas analyzers, industrial process-type, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2023 0.6 0.3 2 0 0
2022 0.5 0.5 2 0 0
2021 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2020 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2019 0.8 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · PA · Pittsburgh

322 Gas analyzers, industrial process-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S20 SEN - ANDOVER 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2967-DE63 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Measurement Solutions-Boulder Flow 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1100 TECHNOLOGY PARK DRIVE 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE CornellCookson 443 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2059 443 FTE
STATE-SIZE Citizen Care 443 FTE
STATE-SIZE GMC Farm 1 444 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Sampson Construction - Johnstown, CO 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Haugland Virgin Islands Inc 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Premcor Refining Group INC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR HGCORP 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate Headquarters 443 FTE
NAT-SIZE OCTA Garden Grove 443 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Zoo, Inc. 443 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marvin Windows and Doors - Grafton 443 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.