Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · North Carolina

Industrial Technologies and Services

Davidson, NC · ~1,307 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Industrial Technologies and Services runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade B.

Industrial Technologies and Services: 1.6 TCR = 77% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Industrial Technologies and Services safety composite

Industrial Technologies and Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Industrial Technologies and Services held a steady TCR band

Industrial Technologies and Services's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.4 in 2020 to 1.8 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.4 · 2021=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Davidson, NC AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 77% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #21/72
  • PHOTO HOC Pleasant Grove
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~1,307 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HOC Pleasant Grove (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Industrial Technologies and Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Industrial Technologies and Services averages 1.6 TCR (77% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Industrial Technologies and Services TCR series: 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.8 · BLS 2.1

Where Industrial Technologies and Services falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 72 Industrial equipment and machi employers in North Carolina.

Industrial Technologies and Services (1,307 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Industrial Technologies and Services
Industrial Technologies and Services (1,307 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Industrial Technologies and Services has more employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.8 0.8 15 0 0
2020 1.4 0.9 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · NC · Davidson

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 22 employers in Davidson, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HOC Pleasant Grove 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Modern Machinery - Billings 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakland Maritime CGI 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMC Mechanical LLC 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vidant Health 1,306 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3811 - Newton DC 1,303 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSCEXC 1,314 FTE
STATE-SIZE Siler City Processing 1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Enterprise Services : ADMIN-Davidson, NC-USA 1,035 FTE
CITY-NEAR Power Tools and Lifting 815 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wayne Brothers Inc. 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gardner Denver Thoms Inc 289 FTE
NAT-TCR Fountain YMCA 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fruita Area Office 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hla Aurora, Ct 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR JFShea Construction-Walnut 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE JBS Plainwell INC 1,307 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marymount Hospital 1,307 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US VA Manassas Godwin Dr (1030) 1,307 FTE
NAT-SIZE 350996-Brooklyn Ny P&Dc 1,306 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.