General services departments, government · California

Information Technology Agency

Los Angeles, CA · ~439 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Information Technology Agency runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General services departments, government workplace, earning a grade A.

Information Technology Agency: 0.8 TCR = 25% of General services departments, government BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Information Technology Agency safety composite

Information Technology Agency scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2023

Information Technology Agency injury rate improved

Information Technology Agency's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.4 in 2017 to 0.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.4 · 2018=0.3 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Los Angeles, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/256
  • PHOTO County of Ventura Pu…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~439 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: County of Ventura Public Defender's Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Information Technology Agency in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Information Technology Agency averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the General services departments, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Information Technology Agency TCR series: 2017=1.4 · 2018=0.3 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.3 · BLS 3.2

Where Information Technology Agency falls in its industry

1,496 General services departments, establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 256 General services departments, employers in California.

Information Technology Agency (439 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Information Technology Agency
Information Technology Agency (439 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Information Technology Agency has more employees than the General services departments, government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.3 0.0 0 1 0
2022 1.3 1.1 6 0 0
2018 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2017 1.4 0.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · CA · Los Angeles

1,496 General services departments, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR County of Ventura Public Defender's Office 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City Hall 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7 New York Mills Offices & Sign Shop 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village of Bensenville 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Longboy Inc 439 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADWP 1212 PALMETTO 439 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edwards Sanborn Solar Storage TerraGen1A 1B 20145007 439 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foodservice : Stockton-Performance 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Terry Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Holland Roofing Group 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR East Coast Underground LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Market Basket #48 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE International Flavors and Fragrances 439 FTE
NAT-SIZE Police Administration 439 FTE
NAT-SIZE PNW Veg Co., dba Quincy Foods 439 FTE
NAT-SIZE Velocity Rail Solutions 439 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.