Activated carbon or charcoal manufacturing · Kentucky

Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant

Wickliffe, KY · ~92 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Activated carbon or charcoal manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant: 0.3 TCR = 10% of Activated carbon or charcoal manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant safety composite

Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant injury rate improved

Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325998 · Wickliffe, KY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO EKC Technology, Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EKC Technology, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the Activated carbon or charcoal manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant falls in its industry

485 Activated carbon or charcoal m establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Activated carbon or charcoal m employers in Kentucky.

Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant (92 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant
Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant (92 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant has more employees than the Activated carbon or charcoal manufacturi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325998 · KY · Wickliffe

485 Activated carbon or charcoal manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 5 employers in Wickliffe, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EKC Technology, Inc 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tate and Lyle Sucralose, LLC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SUEZ WTS USA, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sugar Land Corporate Office 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE East Bend Generating Station 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Judy Construction Company 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frederick & May Construction 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daicel Safety Systems Americas INC (Gas Generant Division) 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHOENIX PAPER WICKLIFFE LLC 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR James Wickliffe 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cairo Marine 16 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cairo Marine 1 15 FTE
NAT-TCR Estee Lauder - Greenway 145 & 155 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rubicon, L.L.C 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cameron Hill Bldg. 1-5, Garage - BCBST 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Division 32 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE A.N. Webber, Inc. - Kankakee 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comfort Systems USA Cincinnati Mechanical 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garden View Care Center 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE CP&P Ashland Precast 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.