General warehousing and storage · Indiana

Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center

Plainfield, IN · ~274 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center: 2.1 TCR = 36% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center safety composite

Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2017

Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center injury rate improved

Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center's TCR fell 0.5 from 2.3 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.3 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Plainfield, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #136/366
  • PHOTO Moen Incorporated-Co…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~274 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moen Incorporated-Component Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center averages 2.1 TCR (36% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=1.9 · BLS 5.8

Where Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #136 safest of 366 General warehousing and storag employers in Indiana.

Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center (274 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center
Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center (274 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Ingram Micro Mobility Plainfield Return Center has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 1.9 0.7 5 0 0
2016 2.3 0.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · IN · Plainfield

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 194 employers in Plainfield, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moen Incorporated-Component Warehouse 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 60526 - CAPSTONE SYSCO HOUSTON 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 60555 - CAPSTONE SYSCO MODESTO CA 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canal Terminal Company INC 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems, LLC 274 FTE
STATE-SIZE 854 274 FTE
STATE-SIZE GEODIS LOGISTICS 43 274 FTE
STATE-SIZE 222 Val1000 274 FTE
CITY-NEAR INFLD - PLAINFIELD 1,747 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6280 1,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4038 1,291 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1621 1,051 FTE
NAT-TCR Oldcastle OPI - Fredericksburg 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Crowne Plaza New Orleans Airport 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MS - San Diego, CA - 1SNCA 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Maintenance of Arkansas, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Office - 01 274 FTE
NAT-SIZE ZWOLLE 274 FTE
NAT-SIZE LaGuardia Airport 274 FTE
NAT-SIZE Classic Chevrolet Sugar Land LLC 274 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.