Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Maryland

Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC

Beltsville, MD · ~51 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC: 1.9 TCR = 67% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC safety composite

Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2019

Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC injury rate improved

Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC's TCR fell 0.5 from 2.1 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.1 · 2019=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Beltsville, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 67% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #11/34
  • PHOTO Elliott Construction…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elliott Construction, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC averages 1.9 TCR (67% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2019=1.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 34 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Maryland.

Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC (51 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC
Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC (51 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2017 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · MD · Beltsville

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 97 employers in Beltsville, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elliott Construction, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apache Pipelines 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kear Civil Corporation 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WRH, Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE White Marsh Training Center 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barkay, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monumental Paving & Excavating, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hagerstown, MD Office 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kaiser 1,670 FTE
CITY-NEAR W.E.Bowers 1,450 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manganaro Mid-Atlantic 920 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beltsville Agricultural Research Center 609 FTE
NAT-TCR NC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR AMEREN ILLINOIS - Effingham 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brooks Brothers Group - LIC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Regal Beloit America, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orlando Int. Airport 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Menoken Pipe & Precast 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Lakes Cheese, Seymour, Inc. 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foodliner-Diamond 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.