Warehousing and storage, general merchandise · Ohio

Innomark Communications- Trade Center

West Chester, OH · ~200 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Innomark Communications- Trade Center runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Innomark Communications- Trade Center: 0.7 TCR = 12% of Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Innomark Communications- Trade Center safety composite

Innomark Communications- Trade Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2022→2024

Innomark Communications- Trade Center injury rate improved

Innomark Communications- Trade Center's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.1 in 2022 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.1 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · West Chester, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #37/556
  • PHOTO GBS Corp
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GBS Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Innomark Communications- Trade Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Innomark Communications- Trade Center averages 0.7 TCR (12% of the Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Innomark Communications- Trade Center TCR series: 2022=1.1 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 5.8

Where Innomark Communications- Trade Center falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing and storage, gener establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 556 Warehousing and storage, gener employers in Ohio.

Innomark Communications- Trade Center (200 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Innomark Communications- Trade Center
Innomark Communications- Trade Center (200 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Innomark Communications- Trade Center has more employees than the Warehousing and storage, general merchan median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2023 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · OH · West Chester

9,477 Warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 205 employers in West Chester, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GBS Corp 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waitex International Co Ltd 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Instrumentation Laboratory North American Distribution Center 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MARTINS DISTRIBUTION CENTER 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eurostampa North America 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE AK Steel - Zanesville Works 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRT Manufacturing- Kettering 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Novelis Ashville OH 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lithko Contracting, LLC 2,120 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Chester Hospital LLC 1,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cornerstone Services Group 1,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ohio DC2 939 FTE
NAT-TCR HMH Hospitals Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Carrier Transicold 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR DMV - Salem -Lana 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Agility Fuel Solutions - Costa Mesa 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Printing Services 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atl Ltl 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gates Corporation 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Millennium Post-Acute Rehabilitation 200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.