Sprayers, manual pump, general purpose-type, manufacturing · Michigan

Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc.

Grand Rapids, MI · ~57 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc. runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Sprayers, manual pump, general purpose-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc.: 1.8 TCR = 55% of Sprayers, manual pump, general purpose-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc. safety composite

Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2019→2020

Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc. injury rate improved

Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.1 from 2.4 in 2019 to 1.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.4 · 2020=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333912 · Grand Rapids, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 55% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO JB Industries
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JB Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc. averages 1.8 TCR (55% of the Sprayers, manual pump, general purpose-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc. TCR series: 2019=2.4 · 2020=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc. falls in its industry

128 Sprayers, manual pump, general establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Sprayers, manual pump, general employers in Michigan.

Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc. (57 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc.
Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc. (57 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Innovative Cleaning Equipment, Inc. has fewer employees than the Sprayers, manual pump, general purpose-t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2019 2.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333912 · MI · Grand Rapids

128 Sprayers, manual pump, general purpose-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JB Industries 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bidell Gas Compression 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Powerex Harrison 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dekker Vacuum 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bloomingdale MI Facility 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville SC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dickinson Homes 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concraft Inc 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR EMCOR Facilities Services (dba) - Viox 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Immokalee Harvesting 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR BLOOM-WB 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pal-Serv LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE MOR 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calipatria Farm 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charolais Care IV, Inc. dba Lincoln County Care Center 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coleman Crisis Services 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.