Distribution line, sewer and water, construction · Pennsylvania

Insight Pipe Contracting LP

Harmony, PA · ~74 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Insight Pipe Contracting LP runs at 217% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution line, sewer and water, construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Insight Pipe Contracting LP: 6.1 TCR = 217% of Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Insight Pipe Contracting LP safety composite

Insight Pipe Contracting LP scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 49% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.9

2018→2024

Insight Pipe Contracting LP injury rate improved

Insight Pipe Contracting LP's TCR fell 8.9 from 13.2 in 2018 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=13.2 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Harmony, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.1 · 217% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #45/54
  • PHOTO CFER
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CFER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Insight Pipe Contracting LP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Insight Pipe Contracting LP averages 6.1 TCR (217% of the Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Insight Pipe Contracting LP TCR series: 2018=13.2 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Insight Pipe Contracting LP falls in its industry

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and w establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 54 Distribution line, sewer and w employers in Pennsylvania.

Insight Pipe Contracting LP (74 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Insight Pipe Contracting LP
Insight Pipe Contracting LP (74 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Insight Pipe Contracting LP has more employees than the Distribution line, sewer and water, cons median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 1.1 4 0 0
2023 2.3 1.2 2 0 0
2022 5.7 1.4 3 1 0
2021 5.7 2.8 4 0 0
2020 3.8 1.3 3 0 0
2019 7.6 1.3 5 1 0
2018 13.2 6.1 12 1 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · PA · Harmony

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and water, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 26 employers in Harmony, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CFER 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR T & C Construction 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Iowa Regional Utilities Association 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Long Beach, Ms. 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE J. D. MUSHROOMS INC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE R . W . Sauder Inc. 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Manheim Egg 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edison Service Center 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Pittsburgh 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harmony Plant 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR BUTLER REFRIGERATED MEATS 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Made LLC. Harmony 131 FTE
NAT-TCR Aloha Termite Kauai Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CA Chico 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bell Nursery - Culpepper 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Schilling St John 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Silverado Escondido - 219 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silverado Sierra Vista - 225 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE C052 Black Satchel 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pentagon EMS 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.