Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Florida

Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge

St. Petersburg, FL · ~41 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge: 7.2 TCR = 189% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge safety composite

Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge: 4.7 → 13.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 13.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.91× in 2021

Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge's TCR rose 8.3 from 4.7 in 2017 to 13.0 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · St. Petersburg, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.2 · 189% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #152/283
  • PHOTO Silverado Hermann Pa…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silverado Hermann Park - 469 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge averages 7.2 TCR (189% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge TCR series: 2017=4.7 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=13 · BLS 3.8

Where Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #152 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge (41 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge
Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge (41 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Inspired Living at Ivy Ridge has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 13.0 6.5 2 2 0
2020 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2017 4.7 4.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · St. Petersburg

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 170 employers in St. Petersburg, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silverado Hermann Park - 469 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Hill Assisted Living 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHS - SummerWood of Chanhassen 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PACIFICA L 44 LLC 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oceans, Reefs & Aquariums, LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE CO1 Cocoa Service Center 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Odessa Transmission Operations 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Trace 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital 3,433 FTE
CITY-NEAR HSN Headquarters 3,128 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Hospital (1105) 2,597 FTE
CITY-NEAR Power Design Inc 2,047 FTE
NAT-TCR Foss Manufactoring Co LLC (P-4) 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pase Contracting, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR ArchCare at Ferncliff Nursing Home 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR PHS - SummerWood of Chanhassen 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Alhambra 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Stonebridge Ranch 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Black Hills Truss & Components 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cannabis Care Wellness Center LLC dba Smokey's 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.