Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Texas

Inspired Living at Sugar Land

Sugar Land, TX · ~66 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Inspired Living at Sugar Land runs at 263% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Inspired Living at Sugar Land: 10.0 TCR = 263% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Inspired Living at Sugar Land safety composite

Inspired Living at Sugar Land scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Inspired Living at Sugar Land: 11.0 → 16.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 16.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.04× in 2021

Inspired Living at Sugar Land's TCR rose 5.6 from 11.0 in 2019 to 16.6 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Sugar Land, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 263% of ind

  • DART 10.4 DART
  • RANK #178/220
  • PHOTO Asbury Pointe
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Asbury Pointe (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Inspired Living at Sugar Land in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Inspired Living at Sugar Land averages 10.0 TCR (263% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Inspired Living at Sugar Land TCR series: 2019=11 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=16.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Inspired Living at Sugar Land falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #178 safest of 220 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Inspired Living at Sugar Land (66 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Inspired Living at Sugar Land
Inspired Living at Sugar Land (66 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Inspired Living at Sugar Land has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 16.6 10.4 8 0 0
2020 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2019 11.0 4.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TX · Sugar Land

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 147 employers in Sugar Land, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Asbury Pointe 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avamere At Oak Park 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inspired Living at Lewisville 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Anderson 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stratford Feedyard 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Klesel 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE BP&L INDUSTRIES ENERGY SERVICES, INC. 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Chemical Company 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED 77,810 FTE
CITY-NEAR TEAM Industrial Services, Inc 5,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schlumberger Sugar Land South 1,934 FTE
CITY-NEAR IES Residential, Inc. 1,931 FTE
NAT-TCR OAK - Inflight 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill Industries of Colorado - Longmont 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR buybuy Baby Morrisville 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Holly Springs 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coilplus Illinois 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asphalt Paving Overhead 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Praxair Surface Technologies 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fitchburg Paperboard 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.