Elementary and secondary schools · California

Institute for the Redesign of Learning

South Pasadena, CA · ~222 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Institute for the Redesign of Learning runs at 564% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Elementary and secondary schools workplace, earning a grade F.

Institute for the Redesign of Learning: 7.9 TCR = 564% of Elementary and secondary schools BLS 1.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Institute for the Redesign of Learning safety composite

Institute for the Redesign of Learning scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.9

2020→2024

Institute for the Redesign of Learning injury rate improved

Institute for the Redesign of Learning's TCR fell 12.9 from 15.7 in 2020 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=15.7 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · South Pasadena, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 564% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #36/63
  • PHOTO Thomas Hooker School
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~222 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thomas Hooker School (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Institute for the Redesign of Learning in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Institute for the Redesign of Learning averages 7.9 TCR (564% of the Elementary and secondary schools BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Institute for the Redesign of Learning TCR series: 2020=15.7 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 1.4

Where Institute for the Redesign of Learning falls in its industry

3,374 Elementary and secondary schoo establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 63 Elementary and secondary schoo employers in California.

Institute for the Redesign of Learning (222 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Institute for the Redesign of Learning
Institute for the Redesign of Learning (222 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Institute for the Redesign of Learning has more employees than the Elementary and secondary schools median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 1.4 6 0 0
2023 5.2 1.9 11 0 0
2020 15.7 10.5 4 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · CA · South Pasadena

3,374 Elementary and secondary schools employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 28 employers in South Pasadena, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thomas Hooker School 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 15 Rose Way, Randolph, MA 02368 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mahnomen Public School 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Valley Learning Center 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Colligere Farm Management 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE LINCOLN HEIGHTS SERVICE CENTER 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE JB Pacific, Inc. 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE W. L. Butler 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR DMS LLC 1,391 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-080 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR DMS Facility Services - South Pasadena 547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Total Education Solutions-Headquarters 334 FTE
NAT-TCR South Florida Container Terminal 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial Glass, Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Grimm Industries 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Y. Hata & Co. Limited - Kauai 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fresh Products 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sysco Pittsburgh 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Katy, Tx (OPD Office/Shop) 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berry Global Waxahachie 222 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.