Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation · Michigan

Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc.

Norton Shores, MI · ~22 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc. runs at 277% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc.: 7.8 TCR = 277% of Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc. safety composite

Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc.: 9.0 → 9.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.63× in 2020

Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.7 from 9.0 in 2018 to 9.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Norton Shores, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 277% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #30/30
  • PHOTO OMNI ERECTING SERVICES
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OMNI ERECTING SERVICES (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc. averages 7.8 TCR (277% of the Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc. TCR series: 2018=9 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=9.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc. falls in its industry

1,138 Machinery and equipment, large establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 30 Machinery and equipment, large employers in Michigan.

Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc.
Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Intelligent Machine Solutions, Inc. has fewer employees than the Machinery and equipment, large-scale, in median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 9.7 4.8 2 0 0
2019 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2018 9.0 4.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · MI · Norton Shores

1,138 Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 40 employers in Norton Shores, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OMNI ERECTING SERVICES 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR LCD Elevator Repair, Inc 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Overhead Door Company of Reading, Pa (Rowens Enterprises) 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkway Elevators Inc. 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Skymint Silo59 Production Facility 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE PRT Brighton 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cadillac Renewable Energy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benzonia 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson Technology, Inc. - Norton 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Norton Shores, MI 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR MillerKnoll Muskegon 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Knoll 312 FTE
NAT-TCR Jewish Hospital Shelbyville 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JLG - Riverside 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Doyon Tourism Inc 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CDS 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Village of Rochester 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smithfield Direct- Oklahoma City 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smithfield Direct- San Antonio 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smithfield Direct- Charleston 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.