Skilled nursing facilities · California

Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation

Norwalk, CA · ~186 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation: 7.8 TCR = 120% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation safety composite

Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2017→2022

Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation injury rate improved

Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation's TCR fell 7.1 from 9.0 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 25.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.0 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=25.3 · 2022=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Norwalk, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.8 · 120% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #359/739
  • PHOTO Pulaski Health Care …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~186 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pulaski Health Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation averages 7.8 TCR (120% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation TCR series: 2017=9 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=25.3 · 2022=1.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #359 safest of 739 Skilled nursing facilities employers in California.

Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation (186 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation
Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation (186 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.9 1.9 1 1 0
2021 25.3 25.3 1 28 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2018 8.8 4.4 9 1 0
2017 9.0 8.1 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Norwalk

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 67 employers in Norwalk, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pulaski Health Care Center 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ignite Medical Resort Crown Point LLC 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Resources Healthcare Fund 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diversicare of Larned 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRIMA NOCE PACKING, INC. 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jorge Castro Farms 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-Redlands Nevada Bldg 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Coast Sales and Service, Inc. 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metropolitan State Hospital 1,782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Department of State Hospitals 1,475 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder County Clerk 1,302 FTE
CITY-NEAR MEC Manufacturing LLC Norwalk 1,255 FTE
NAT-TCR Mary Breckinridge ARH 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-373-OUTLETS 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 161446-Channahon Po 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 250690-Bay City Po 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Business Services 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Paper -Tampa Container 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-FLPEN10 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01478 186 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.