Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · California

Interconnect Systems Inc.

Camarillo, CA · ~124 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Interconnect Systems Inc. runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Interconnect Systems Inc.: 0.5 TCR = 14% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Interconnect Systems Inc. safety composite

Interconnect Systems Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2017→2021

Interconnect Systems Inc. injury rate improved

Interconnect Systems Inc.'s TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Camarillo, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/29
  • PHOTO Smiths Interconnect …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smiths Interconnect Kansas City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Interconnect Systems Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Interconnect Systems Inc. averages 0.5 TCR (14% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Interconnect Systems Inc. TCR series: 2017=1.3 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Interconnect Systems Inc. falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 29 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in California.

Interconnect Systems Inc. (124 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Interconnect Systems Inc.
Interconnect Systems Inc. (124 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Interconnect Systems Inc. has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.3 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · CA · Camarillo

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Camarillo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smiths Interconnect Kansas City 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Molex, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PLIMPHOLGPLI FIESTA BLVD 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR K05 ICT - Hemet 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rancho Guadalupe 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrew Smith Company 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Four Star Management LLC 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE California 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-09 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 558 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State University Channel Islands 1,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Channel Islands Social Services 1,488 FTE
NAT-TCR Legal Department 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wtfohc-015-Wichita Falls Home Care 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ILJIN 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mobile, AL - Jackson, MS HVAC 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE HSP 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE TRP 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE RUT 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE REA 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.