Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard · Alabama

Intercontinental Packaging, Inc

Opelika, AL · ~47 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Intercontinental Packaging, Inc runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Intercontinental Packaging, Inc: 1.1 TCR = 32% of Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Intercontinental Packaging, Inc safety composite

Intercontinental Packaging, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Intercontinental Packaging, Inc: 0.0 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2.32× in 2024

Intercontinental Packaging, Inc's TCR rose 2.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Opelika, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #6/22
  • PHOTO Orlando - D021
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orlando - D021 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Intercontinental Packaging, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Intercontinental Packaging, Inc averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Intercontinental Packaging, Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Intercontinental Packaging, Inc falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber box establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 22 Corrugated and solid fiber box employers in Alabama.

Intercontinental Packaging, Inc (47 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Intercontinental Packaging, Inc
Intercontinental Packaging, Inc (47 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Intercontinental Packaging, Inc has fewer employees than the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made fr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · AL · Opelika

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 87 employers in Opelika, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orlando - D021 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond Industries Rd. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Bay Packaging Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sanger Container 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jasper Complex - APC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE War Construction, Inc 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Equipment & Crew, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ardent Mills Decatur 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6095 849 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6095 843 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mando America Corporation 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanwha Advanced Materials America LLC. Opelika 470 FTE
NAT-TCR Beaverton Honda 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta- Dry Bulk Transport 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ANDRES Construction Services 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookstone of Aledo 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE CP&P Summerville Precast 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Menasha Packaging Company - Muscatine 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE F.I.R.M. Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bbb 11850 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.