Carpentry, framing · Maryland

Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction

Jessup, MD · ~71 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction runs at 246% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Carpentry, framing workplace, earning a grade F.

Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction: 6.9 TCR = 246% of Carpentry, framing BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction safety composite

Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction: 4.5 → 16.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 16.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.56× in 2021

Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction's TCR rose 11.6 from 4.5 in 2016 to 16.1 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238130 · Jessup, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 246% of ind

  • DART 10.8 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Advanced Constructio…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Advanced Construction Southwest of Arizona Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction averages 6.9 TCR (246% of the Carpentry, framing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=16.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction falls in its industry

387 Carpentry, framing establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Carpentry, framing employers in Maryland.

Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction (71 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction
Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction (71 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Interiors Jessup - Cleveland Construction has more employees than the Carpentry, framing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 16.1 10.8 6 0 0
2020 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2019 6.6 5.0 8 0 0
2018 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 4.5 3.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238130 · MD · Jessup

387 Carpentry, framing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 122 employers in Jessup, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Advanced Construction Southwest of Arizona Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scott Silverman & Associates, Inc. 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MONARCH CONSTRUCTION CO 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lugo Framing 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE HARBOR ROOFING and CONTRACTING INC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE NOEL's FIRE PROTECTION 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE CAN-AM CONTRACTORS, INC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jimmy Richards and Sons Excavating, Inc. 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster Foods 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jessup Correctional Institution 530 FTE
CITY-NEAR RNDC Jessup 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Baltimore, LLC 491 FTE
NAT-TCR Tom's Of Maine 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Loma Clara Senior Living 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Performance Ledyard - 0680 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wallace Truck & Equipment Sales Inc 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Interstate Mechanical Corp 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE STA-Little Elm (TEX-750) 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ii-Vi Ms 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire & Life Safety America Corporate Office 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.