Distribution of electric power · Colorado

Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park

Woodland Park, CO · ~17 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park runs at 392% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park: 4.7 TCR = 392% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park safety composite

Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.1

2016→2019

Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park injury rate improved

Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park's TCR fell 14.1 from 14.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Woodland Park, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.7 · 392% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #51/69
  • PHOTO SUNSC Sunbury Servic…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~17 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SUNSC Sunbury Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park averages 4.7 TCR (392% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park TCR series: 2016=14.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 69 Distribution of electric power employers in Colorado.

Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park (17 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park
Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park (17 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Intermountain Rural Electric Association-Woodland Park has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 14.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · CO · Woodland Park

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 20 employers in Woodland Park, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SUNSC Sunbury Service Center 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ROLAND LUCKY 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sands Place Operating - 1769 Sands Pl. Marietta 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PIPELINE OPERATIONS - TRACY 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Platteville Dairy 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Isabel Electric Association- Bear Creek 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE DSP Builders, Inc. 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riverside Fabrication, Inc. 17 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3805 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3805 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pikes Peak Regional Hospital 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Forest Ridge Senior Living 100 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Tenet Doctors M/C Fans 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sansum Clinic 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0029 3086 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0025 2894 4.7 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.