Boxes, wood, manufacturing · Alabama

International Crating and Assembly Corporation

Montgomery, AL · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

International Crating and Assembly Corporation runs at 364% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boxes, wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

International Crating and Assembly Corporation: 12.0 TCR = 364% of Boxes, wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

International Crating and Assembly Corporation safety composite

International Crating and Assembly Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−30.8

2017→2020

International Crating and Assembly Corporation injury rate improved

International Crating and Assembly Corporation's TCR fell 30.8 from 30.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 30.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=30.8 · 2018=9.0 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Montgomery, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 364% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/19
  • PHOTO Pallet Logistics of …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pallet Logistics of America - Houston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

International Crating and Assembly Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows International Crating and Assembly Corporation averages 12.0 TCR (364% of the Boxes, wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

International Crating and Assembly Corporation TCR series: 2017=30.8 · 2018=9 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where International Crating and Assembly Corporation falls in its industry

952 Boxes, wood, manufacturing establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 19 Boxes, wood, manufacturing employers in Alabama.

International Crating and Assembly Corporation (23 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate International Crating and Assembly Corporation
International Crating and Assembly Corporation (23 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

International Crating and Assembly Corporation has fewer employees than the Boxes, wood, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.2 8.2 2 0 0
2018 9.0 4.5 1 1 0
2017 30.8 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · AL · Montgomery

952 Boxes, wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 420 employers in Montgomery, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pallet Logistics of America - Houston 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TransPak - DIV 115 San Diego 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR WIC Carrollton 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Propak - Pasco RLC, WA 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods Geraldine Breeder/Broilers 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashland Breeder and Broiler 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decatur hatchery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tenaska Central Alabama Generating Station 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC 3,611 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Medical Center South 2,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jackson Hospital & Clinic 2,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Montgomery 1,561 FTE
NAT-TCR Ophthalmology Surgery Center of Dallas 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Isometrics, Inc. - 2 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosewood Villa Assisted Living 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Dinner Entertainment, LLC. 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Reading Equipment Distribution Midwest 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paltech Enterprises Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maine Track Maintenance Fairfield Office 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Curtis Bay 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.