Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Missouri

International Paper St. Louis Container

Fenton, MO · ~82 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

International Paper St. Louis Container runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

International Paper St. Louis Container: 1.4 TCR = 43% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

International Paper St. Louis Container safety composite

International Paper St. Louis Container scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

International Paper St. Louis Container: 1.2 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.78× in 2019

International Paper St. Louis Container's TCR rose 1.1 from 1.2 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Fenton, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #16/36
  • PHOTO Box-Board Products -…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Box-Board Products - 8313 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

International Paper St. Louis Container in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows International Paper St. Louis Container averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

International Paper St. Louis Container TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where International Paper St. Louis Container falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 36 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Missouri.

International Paper St. Louis Container (82 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate International Paper St. Louis Container
International Paper St. Louis Container (82 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

International Paper St. Louis Container has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.3 1.1 2 0 0
2018 2.3 1.1 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · MO · Fenton

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 154 employers in Fenton, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Box-Board Products - 8313 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Fe Springs Grid 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper - Maryland Heights 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - Lake Road Generating Facility 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bordner Home Improvement 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Storee Construction Co 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE K & E Flatwork LLC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Clare Hospital - Fenton 1,044 FTE
CITY-NEAR UniGroup 854 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sachs Electric Company 707 FTE
CITY-NEAR MaritzCX Research LLC - Fenton 538 FTE
NAT-TCR JohnsonMfg 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Gateway Tire & Service Center-Medina 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR AWS - Brandywine 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE SMT Lines - DAL 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Darlington 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hobbs Bonded Fibers NA, LLC. 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sewell Mini of Plano 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.