Cold storage warehousing · Indiana

Interstate Warehousing Anderson

Anderson, IN · ~88 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Interstate Warehousing Anderson runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cold storage warehousing workplace, earning a grade A.

Interstate Warehousing Anderson: 1.2 TCR = 21% of Cold storage warehousing BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Interstate Warehousing Anderson safety composite

Interstate Warehousing Anderson scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Interstate Warehousing Anderson: 0.0 → 0.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2024

Interstate Warehousing Anderson's TCR rose 0.7 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Anderson, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #2/27
  • PHOTO Arkansas Refrigerate…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arkansas Refrigerated Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Interstate Warehousing Anderson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Interstate Warehousing Anderson averages 1.2 TCR (21% of the Cold storage warehousing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Interstate Warehousing Anderson TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 5.8

Where Interstate Warehousing Anderson falls in its industry

1,039 Cold storage warehousing establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 27 Cold storage warehousing employers in Indiana.

Interstate Warehousing Anderson (88 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Interstate Warehousing Anderson
Interstate Warehousing Anderson (88 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Interstate Warehousing Anderson has more employees than the Cold storage warehousing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2023 1.7 0.9 2 0 0
2022 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · IN · Anderson

1,039 Cold storage warehousing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 103 employers in Anderson, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arkansas Refrigerated Services 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR WDC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Omaha - Gomez (South) PRW 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joslin Distribution Center 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Automated Egg Producers 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2948_5705 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Municipal Services Division 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairchild Communication Systems, Inc 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carter Express Inc 1,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital Anderson 1,212 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARRAH'S HOOSIER PARK RACING & CASINO 804 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle USA 798 FTE
NAT-TCR Electric Power Systems, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Arms Trans Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1004-41 GoJet STL Flight Operations 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Allstate Construction, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Middleton Construction Inc. 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Il. Dept. of Revenue - Des Plaines 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE SBS Georgia (Alpharetta) 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Laguna 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.