General warehousing and storage · Colorado

Interstate Warehousing of Colorado

Denver, CO · ~148 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Interstate Warehousing of Colorado runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Interstate Warehousing of Colorado: 2.1 TCR = 36% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Interstate Warehousing of Colorado safety composite

Interstate Warehousing of Colorado scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Interstate Warehousing of Colorado held a steady TCR band

Interstate Warehousing of Colorado's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.7 in 2019 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.7 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Denver, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #22/100
  • PHOTO National Distributio…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~148 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: National Distribution Centers LLC-1750 SHENANGO ROAD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Interstate Warehousing of Colorado in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Interstate Warehousing of Colorado averages 2.1 TCR (36% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Interstate Warehousing of Colorado TCR series: 2019=0.7 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=3 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 5.8

Where Interstate Warehousing of Colorado falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 100 General warehousing and storag employers in Colorado.

Interstate Warehousing of Colorado (148 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Interstate Warehousing of Colorado
Interstate Warehousing of Colorado (148 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Interstate Warehousing of Colorado has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2023 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2022 3.0 1.5 4 0 0
2021 2.3 0.0 3 0 0
2020 5.1 0.0 7 0 0
2019 0.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CO · Denver

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-1750 SHENANGO ROAD 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advance Auto Parts DC 11 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-4815 S. HELLMAN AVE 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0559 GEODIS LOGISTICS 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Enerplus Resources USA Corporation 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-3206 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-1755 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE 620-00112 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR Bahama House 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR White Hall 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 4003 - Tpg/Pbm 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pineville Service Center 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Piston Automotive 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walters & Wolf Interiors 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nitto Avecia Cincinnati Bldg. 51 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE B25 148 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.