Printing Ink Manufacturer · Wisconsin

INX International Ink Co. (3100)

Appleton, WI · ~90 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

INX International Ink Co. (3100) runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Printing Ink Manufacturer workplace, earning a grade A.

INX International Ink Co. (3100): 1.3 TCR = 39% of Printing Ink Manufacturer BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

INX International Ink Co. (3100) safety composite

INX International Ink Co. (3100) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2023

INX International Ink Co. (3100) injury rate improved

INX International Ink Co. (3100)'s TCR fell 0.4 from 1.4 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.3 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.0 · 2023=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325910 · Appleton, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Sun Chemical CTS/Inp…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sun Chemical CTS/Inplant Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

INX International Ink Co. (3100) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows INX International Ink Co. (3100) averages 1.3 TCR (39% of the Printing Ink Manufacturer BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

INX International Ink Co. (3100) TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.3 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1 · 2023=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where INX International Ink Co. (3100) falls in its industry

111 Printing Ink Manufacturer establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Printing Ink Manufacturer employers in Wisconsin.

INX International Ink Co. (3100) (90 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate INX International Ink Co. (3100)
INX International Ink Co. (3100) (90 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

INX International Ink Co. (3100) has more employees than the Printing Ink Manufacturer median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2020 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 - - 5 0 0
2018 3.3 2.2 2 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325910 · WI · Appleton

111 Printing Ink Manufacturer employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 356 employers in Appleton, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sun Chemical CTS/Inplant Group 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATL-NAZ-ATLANTA 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fujifilm Imaging Colorants, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sun Chemical Atlanta Mfg 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dairyland Seed 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gabe's Construction 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE CBC - Verona 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Madison WI Branch 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center Appleton 1,649 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center-Appleton 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Operations 1,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fox Valley Technical College (WI) 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR Clean Control Corp 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hastings College - Hastings, NE 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tec 23 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ducommun Joplin 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Red Cross - 39810 Grand River 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE JBT Foodtech Russellville 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Antonio Sheet Plant 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peninsula Improvement Corporation 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.