Printing Ink Manufacturer · North Carolina

INX International Ink Co. (6400)

Charlotte, NC · ~199 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

INX International Ink Co. (6400) runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Printing Ink Manufacturer workplace, earning a grade B.

INX International Ink Co. (6400): 2.5 TCR = 75% of Printing Ink Manufacturer BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

INX International Ink Co. (6400) safety composite

INX International Ink Co. (6400) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2016→2023

INX International Ink Co. (6400) injury rate improved

INX International Ink Co. (6400)'s TCR fell 5.5 from 6.3 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.3 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=2.1 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=1.9 · 2023=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325910 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 75% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Flint Group Packagin…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~199 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Flint Group Packaging Inks North America LLC - Dallas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

INX International Ink Co. (6400) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows INX International Ink Co. (6400) averages 2.5 TCR (75% of the Printing Ink Manufacturer BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

INX International Ink Co. (6400) TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=2.1 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=1.9 · 2023=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where INX International Ink Co. (6400) falls in its industry

111 Printing Ink Manufacturer establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Printing Ink Manufacturer employers in North Carolina.

INX International Ink Co. (6400) (199 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate INX International Ink Co. (6400)
INX International Ink Co. (6400) (199 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

INX International Ink Co. (6400) has more employees than the Printing Ink Manufacturer median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2021 1.9 0.9 4 0 0
2020 2.5 2.0 5 0 0
2019 - - 4 1 0
2018 2.1 1.0 4 0 0
2017 1.1 0.6 1 1 0
2016 6.3 4.6 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325910 · NC · Charlotte

111 Printing Ink Manufacturer employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Flint Group Packaging Inks North America LLC - Dallas 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wikoff Color Corp. - Grand Rapids 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amica Software 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2135 Manufacturing LLC 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Public Works 199 FTE
STATE-SIZE JBS Retail Ready 199 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lotus Bakeries US Manufacturing LLC 199 FTE
STATE-SIZE Essentra HPC Greensboro 199 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Duro-Last Roofing (MA) 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR REG Grays Harbor, LLC 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sentman Distributors, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Air Centers, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amcor Rigid Packaging 199 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dekko - Garrett 199 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lion Elastomers - PN 199 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flextronics Automotive Manufacturing Inc 199 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.