Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) · Kansas

Irsik and Doll Feed Yard

Garden City, KS · ~38 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Irsik and Doll Feed Yard runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Irsik and Doll Feed Yard: 10.3 TCR = 230% of Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Irsik and Doll Feed Yard safety composite

Irsik and Doll Feed Yard scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−23.0

2016→2024

Irsik and Doll Feed Yard injury rate improved

Irsik and Doll Feed Yard's TCR fell 23.0 from 24.8 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 25.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=24.8 · 2017=25.0 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=14.7 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112112 · Garden City, KS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 230% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #48/50
  • PHOTO South Lot
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: South Lot (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Irsik and Doll Feed Yard in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Irsik and Doll Feed Yard averages 10.3 TCR (230% of the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Irsik and Doll Feed Yard TCR series: 2016=24.8 · 2017=25 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=14.7 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Irsik and Doll Feed Yard falls in its industry

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except s establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 50 Beef cattle feedlots (except s employers in Kansas.

Irsik and Doll Feed Yard (38 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Irsik and Doll Feed Yard
Irsik and Doll Feed Yard (38 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Irsik and Doll Feed Yard has fewer employees than the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2021 7.8 7.8 4 0 0
2020 7.1 3.6 4 0 0
2019 14.7 11.1 8 0 0
2018 10.1 5.0 4 0 0
2017 25.0 21.8 8 0 0
2016 24.8 18.6 6 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112112 · KS · Garden City

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 84 employers in Garden City, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR South Lot 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR L&L Ranches Idaho Nevada Utah 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR JSMM Farms Albion 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roberts Cattle Company 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Sublette 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Friona Cattle Feeders North #1 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Plains Cattle Company LLC - Sublette 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oil field Services 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Catherine Hospital 722 FTE
CITY-NEAR 652 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 652 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR 615-00005 148 FTE
NAT-TCR Proctor Division 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern Welding Company of Kentucky, Inc. (Elizabethtown) 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Siouxland Fabricating, Inc 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR So Goodwill Roseburg 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Geneva Commons #124 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE GBC Structures 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson Distribution 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ziese & Sons Excavating, Inc. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.