Elementary and secondary schools · Minnesota

ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center

New Hope, MN · ~114 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center runs at 434% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Elementary and secondary schools workplace, earning a grade F.

ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center: 6.1 TCR = 434% of Elementary and secondary schools BLS 1.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center safety composite

ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2021→2022

ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center injury rate improved

ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center's TCR fell 1.0 from 6.6 in 2021 to 5.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=6.6 · 2022=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · New Hope, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.1 · 434% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #1208/1589
  • PHOTO Casimir Pulaski School
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Casimir Pulaski School (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center averages 6.1 TCR (434% of the Elementary and secondary schools BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center TCR series: 2021=6.6 · 2022=5.5 · BLS 1.4

Where ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center falls in its industry

3,374 Elementary and secondary schoo establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1208 safest of 1589 Elementary and secondary schoo employers in Minnesota.

ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center (114 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center
ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center (114 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

ISD 281 Robbinsdale - New Hope Learning Center has more employees than the Elementary and secondary schools median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.5 3.7 3 0 0
2021 6.6 1.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · MN · New Hope

3,374 Elementary and secondary schools employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 95 employers in New Hope, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Casimir Pulaski School 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viking Elementary 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benson Public Schools 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ISD 742 Westwood Elementary 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coon Rapids MND5 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE HM Cragg 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Master Electric 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morris Packaging, LLC 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Therese of New Hope 391 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horwitz, Inc 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hope - Main Store 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Education Center 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Kitchen Cooked - Farmington 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Where The Heart Is 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Pointe of Rolla 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Willowbrook Place 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4389 Bridgeview Container 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0034-0034-01725 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0034-0034-00726 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manheim San Francisco Bay 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.