Building cleaning services, janitorial · Texas

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston

Houston, TX · ~124 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade B.

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston: 2.3 TCR = 52% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston safety composite

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston: 2.3 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 2.21× in 2019

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston's TCR rose 2.8 from 2.3 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 2.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 52% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #168/417
  • PHOTO Memorial Hermann Hos…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Memorial Hermann Hosp Texas Me (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston averages 2.3 TCR (52% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.2 · BLS 4.5

Where ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #168 safest of 417 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Texas.

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston (124 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston
ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston (124 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Houston has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.2 5.2 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.8 1.8 3 0 0
2016 2.3 2.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · TX · Houston

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Memorial Hermann Hosp Texas Me 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clean Team, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frye Regional Medical Center - EVS 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Operations 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Citadel Drilling Ltd 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cisco Logistics 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Bellaire 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stoneridge Solar 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Staff Development Administration 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mills County YMCA 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Monmouth-Roseville CUSD #$238 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Program Transportation, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Manufacturing 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1645 W. Jefferson 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Magic City Ford Lincoln Izuzu 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Providence Landscape Group 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.