Building cleaning services, interior · Indiana

ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account

Indianapolis, IN · ~48 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Building cleaning services, interior workplace, earning a grade B.

ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account: 3.2 TCR = 71% of Building cleaning services, interior BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account safety composite

ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2017

ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account injury rate improved

ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account's TCR fell 0.5 from 3.4 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.4 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.2 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #60/99
  • PHOTO Starbucks Roastery
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Starbucks Roastery (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account averages 3.2 TCR (71% of the Building cleaning services, interior BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=3 · BLS 4.5

Where ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, in establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 99 Building cleaning services, in employers in Indiana.

ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account (48 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account
ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account (48 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

ISS Facility Services, Rolls-Royce Account has fewer employees than the Building cleaning services, interior median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.4 3.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · IN · Indianapolis

4,064 Building cleaning services, interior employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Starbucks Roastery 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSSI - 0031 JBS USA - Marshalltown 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2563_4847 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alabama Cleaning Service 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Police Department 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pure Green Farms 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International Rushville 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harrison County REMC 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR 052 Black Satchel 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Solutions : IS - SC - Tucson, AZ, USA 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR NA-US-NY-Elmsford-Ridgewood Drive 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Berry Rd 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Truman Valley Healthcare Inc 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Malden LLC 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeast Connections LLc ( Savannah, Georgia) 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Building 21/CP/Fleet /Maint 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.