Instrument control panels (i.e., assembling purchased gauges), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Oregon

ISSPRO, Inc.

Portland, OR · ~101 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ISSPRO, Inc. runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Instrument control panels (i.e., assembling purchased gauges), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

ISSPRO, Inc.: 1.5 TCR = 28% of Instrument control panels (i.e., assembling purchased gauges), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ISSPRO, Inc. safety composite

ISSPRO, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ISSPRO, Inc.: 2.5 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.66× in 2024

ISSPRO, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.7 from 2.5 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336320 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 28% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK P65
  • PHOTO HI-LEX Hudson (HCIH)
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HI-LEX Hudson (HCIH) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

ISSPRO, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ISSPRO, Inc. averages 1.5 TCR (28% of the Instrument control panels (i.e., assembling purchased gauges), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ISSPRO, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=6.3 · BLS 5.4

Where ISSPRO, Inc. falls in its industry

216 Instrument control panels (i.e establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
ISSPRO, Inc. (101 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate ISSPRO, Inc.
ISSPRO, Inc. (101 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9

ISSPRO, Inc. has fewer employees than the Instrument control panels (i.e., assembl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.3 2.5 3 2 0
2023 2.4 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.5 0.0 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336320 · OR · Portland

216 Instrument control panels (i.e., assembling purchased gauges), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HI-LEX Hudson (HCIH) 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dynacraft - McKinney 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Muncy Corporation 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AmTech, LLC 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Performance Insulation - Main Office 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE 752-PL001 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR042 Coos Bay Sawmill 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interfor U.S. Inc. Molalla Division 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Mervis Industries - Decatur 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bei - Ma 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR M. Braun, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #59 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tosca - Garland 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ebony Lake Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elgin Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aegis of Shoreline I 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.