Ambulance and fire service combined · Illinois

Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1

Itasca, IL · ~27 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1 runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Ambulance and fire service combined workplace, earning a grade D.

Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1: 6.4 TCR = 200% of Ambulance and fire service combined BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1 safety composite

Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1: 5.3 → 11.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 14.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.74× in 2024

Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1's TCR rose 5.8 from 5.3 in 2017 to 11.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Itasca, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 200% of ind

  • DART 11.1 DART
  • RANK #67/262
  • PHOTO FIRE/EMERGENCY MANAG…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FIRE/EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1 averages 6.4 TCR (200% of the Ambulance and fire service combined BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1 TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2018=14 · 2019=5.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.7 · 2024=11.1 · BLS 3.2

Where Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1 falls in its industry

793 Ambulance and fire service com establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 262 Ambulance and fire service com employers in Illinois.

Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1 (27 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1
Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1 (27 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

Itasca Fire Protection District No. 1 has fewer employees than the Ambulance and fire service combined median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.1 11.1 3 0 0
2022 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.3 2.6 0 2 0
2018 14.0 8.4 3 2 0
2017 5.3 5.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · IL · Itasca

793 Ambulance and fire service combined employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 110 employers in Itasca, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FIRE/EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire Department 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Geneva Fire Department 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire & EMS 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pizzo Native Plant Nursery, LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE C070 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stonington, IL-R&D 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bloomington 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diverzify 1,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fellowes, Inc Itasca 536 FTE
CITY-NEAR JH Associate Management LLC 526 FTE
CITY-NEAR MTS Titan Electric 460 FTE
NAT-TCR Dover Plant 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Coon Creek 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hellas Fibers 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SLC-481 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fenceworks Rental Systems Inc 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zampell Refractories Inc. Texas Division 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Composite Technologies International Plant 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Synergy Colfax C-Store 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.