Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors · Washington

ITC Washington

Auburn, WA · ~29 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ITC Washington runs at 688% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

ITC Washington: 19.3 TCR = 688% of Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ITC Washington safety composite

ITC Washington scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.2

2017→2021

ITC Washington injury rate improved

ITC Washington's TCR fell 13.2 from 17.9 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 38.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.9 · 2019=38.2 · 2020=16.2 · 2021=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Auburn, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.3 · 688% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #125/127
  • PHOTO Ecotech Energy Syste…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ecotech Energy Systems LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

ITC Washington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ITC Washington averages 19.3 TCR (688% of the Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ITC Washington TCR series: 2017=17.9 · 2019=38.2 · 2020=16.2 · 2021=4.8 · BLS 2.8

Where ITC Washington falls in its industry

4,550 Telecommunications equipment a establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #125 safest of 127 Telecommunications equipment a employers in Washington.

ITC Washington (29 employees, TCR 19.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate ITC Washington
ITC Washington (29 employees, TCR 19.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

ITC Washington has fewer employees than the Telecommunications equipment and wiring median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2020 16.2 10.8 3 0 0
2019 38.2 38.2 5 0 0
2017 17.9 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · WA · Auburn

4,550 Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 166 employers in Auburn, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ecotech Energy Systems LLC 19.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PowerHome Solar Chesterfield 19.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meisner Electric, Inc. 19.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turney lighting and Electric - 2 18.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Griffin Creek Farm 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE DG ORCHARDS LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frenchman Hills 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consolidated Fruit, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA001 4,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zones, LLC 1,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR Muckleshoot Casino 1,616 FTE
CITY-NEAR Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR Aroostook Band of Micmacs 19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 230409-Bal-Govans Sta 19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02442 19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Caritas Management Corporation 19.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ballard Truss - Snowflake Plant 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Campus - Women's Residential Treatment 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Villagio Bradford Village 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE C&D Plumbing and Mechanical LLC 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.