Food machinery repair and maintenance services · Florida

ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch

Miami, FL · ~41 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch runs at 282% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch: 5.9 TCR = 282% of Food machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch safety composite

ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2022→2023

ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch injury rate improved

ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch's TCR fell 8.0 from 9.9 in 2022 to 1.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=9.9 · 2023=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Miami, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.9 · 282% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #109/122
  • PHOTO Hobart Service Atlanta
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hobart Service Atlanta (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch averages 5.9 TCR (282% of the Food machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch TCR series: 2022=9.9 · 2023=1.9 · BLS 2.1

Where ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch falls in its industry

2,560 Food machinery repair and main establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #109 safest of 122 Food machinery repair and main employers in Florida.

ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch (41 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch
ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch (41 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

ITW/Hobart Service-Miami Branch has fewer employees than the Food machinery repair and maintenance se median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2022 9.9 2.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · FL · Miami

2,560 Food machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,467 employers in Miami, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hobart Service Atlanta 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryder Location 0275 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITW/Hobart Service-Kansas City Branch 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITW/Hobart Service-Cincinnati Branch 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oceans, Reefs & Aquariums, LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE CO1 Cocoa Service Center 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Odessa Transmission Operations 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Trace 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-MIA-MIAMI-MIA-TRML 9,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospital of Miami Inc. 6,876 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIACX0UPS MIA UPS 3,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Miami 2,879 FTE
NAT-TCR IQHC Fairmont MN 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Doubletree by Hilton Little Rock 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Collins Products LLC 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4266 CHICO, CA 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Canandaigua Emergency Squad, Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tom Gullickson Inc 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE GA - Sony Direct 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Veritiv Operating Company - TX392 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.