Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Ivy Park at Culver City

Los Angeles, CA · ~69 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ivy Park at Culver City runs at 376% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Ivy Park at Culver City: 14.3 TCR = 376% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ivy Park at Culver City safety composite

Ivy Park at Culver City scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.7

2022→2024

Ivy Park at Culver City injury rate improved

Ivy Park at Culver City's TCR fell 16.7 from 23.4 in 2022 to 6.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 23.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=23.4 · 2023=12.9 · 2024=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.3 · 376% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #492/635
  • PHOTO Columbia Cottage-Col…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Columbia Cottage-Collegeville,PA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ivy Park at Culver City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ivy Park at Culver City averages 14.3 TCR (376% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ivy Park at Culver City TCR series: 2022=23.4 · 2023=12.9 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Ivy Park at Culver City falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #492 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Ivy Park at Culver City (69 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ivy Park at Culver City
Ivy Park at Culver City (69 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Ivy Park at Culver City has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 6.7 4 0 0
2023 12.9 11.3 8 0 0
2022 23.4 20.0 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Los Angeles

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Columbia Cottage-Collegeville,PA 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR THE GRANDE AT CREVE COEUR 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ecumenical Communities (Managed by Country Meadows Retirement Communities - a GML Family Corp. 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Timberwood Court Memory Care 14.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Woolf Enterprises 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terranova Ranch, Inc 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rayo Shop 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Harvesting | Citrus Harvesting 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFI7 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR First Street Bradford 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0680 Glen Ellyn 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0521 Westport 14.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 500 Hudson Valley Avenue 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE DiLullo Transport Inc 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE 7746-Pdllc-Heidelberg University 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE 7581-Pdllc-Marietta College 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.